Issue Eighteen

16 April 2006

In recent times the subject of AIDS has been to the forefront in New Zealand. In October 2005 Auckland hosted the Pan Pacific conference on HIV and AIDS. The closing plenary concluded that a number of steps were necessary to bring about effective change in the Pacific, including the need for "religious leaders to take up the challenge presented by HIV and AIDS and discuss sexuality and HIV issues openly and constructively". We have made issue eighteen a themed issue on HIV-AIDS.

Editorial HIV-AIDS in Oceania
HIV-AIDS is the biggest challenge that the Church in Oceania currently faces, yet many people have only a limited awareness of the extent of the pandemic. The challenges presented by AIDS call for fresh theological and pastoral approaches and simultaneously call us to return to the traditional fonts of moral wisdom and view them from a fresh perspective. Compassion must shape our response to HIV-AIDS.

Vital Strategies for a Global AIDS Response: Pope John XXIII's "Pillars of Peace"
An edited version of an address delivered by Rev Robert J Vitillo, the Geneva-based Special Advisor on HIV and AIDS to Caritas Internationalis. —— the 'missing link' in the global AIDS response is the authentic human development made possible through the four "pillars of peace" proposed by John XXIII: truth, justice, freedom, and love.—

Church's Response to HIV-AIDS in Oceania
In this article, Dr Michael McCabe shares insights and reflections based on three separate workshops run by The Nathaniel Centre, in partnership with Caritas-Aotearoa New Zealand, to address the AIDS pandemic in Oceania and the Pacific Islands. In formulating a theological and pastoral response to HIV-AIDS the Church must facilitate an open and honest dialogue between the local culture and the Gospel. All cultures and religions have aspects of their thinking and acting that need conversion and growth.

AIDS and Condoms: An Ongoing Debate
Are condoms justified as part of a strategy for dealing with the spread of HIV-AIDS? A survey of the ongoing debate about AIDS and Condoms within Catholicism.

Some Facts about AIDS
A summary of Global and Oceania statistics on HIV-AIDS based on UNAIDS and WHO data.

 

 

 


  • Nathaniel Centre Staff 1 April 2006

    GLOBAL STATISTICS:

    • Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) has killed more than 25 million people since it was first recognised in 1981.
    • UNAIDS figures released in December 2005 revealed that globally there were 3 million AIDS deaths during 2005, 570,000 of which were children.
    • Around 5 million people have been newly infected with AIDS in 2005.
    • The total number of people infected worldwide has risen from 37.5 million in 2004 to 40.3 million in 2005 the highest ever level.
    • A total of 2.3 million children under 15 years live with the AIDS virus.
    • Two-thirds of all people infected with HIV-AIDS live in Sub-Saharan Africa.
    • 77% of all women with HIV live in sub-Saharan Africa.
    • In sub-Saharan Africa more than 12 million children under the age of 15 have lost one or both parents to AIDS.
    • In 2005, 17.5 million women (43%) were living with HIV - there has been an increase in the proportion of women being affected by the epidemic.
    • In several southern African countries, more than three quarters of all young people (15-24 yrs) living with HIV are women while in sub-Saharan Africa overall, young women between 15 and 24 years old are at least three times more likely to be HIV-positive than young men.

    OCEANIA STATISTICS:

    • In 2005 an estimated 74,000 adults and children were living with HIV-AIDS in Oceania, up from an estimated 63,000 in 2003.
    • The number of women living with HIV is estimated at 39,000 or 55% of cases (44% in 2003) in Oceania compared with an estimated 46% of all adults globally.
    • Since 1997, HIV diagnoses have increased by about 30% each year in Papua New Guinea; approximately 10,000 HIV cases had been diagnosed by the end of 2004, although the actual number of people living with HIV could five times as high.
    • Information from Papua New Guinea points to a mainly heterosexual epidemic fostered largely by commercial sex and casual sex networks.
    • HIV diagnoses have started to increase in Australia again after a decline of approximately 25% between 1995 and 2000.
    • Injecting drug use accounted for 20% of diagnoses in Indigenous Australian people as compared to 3% of non-Indigenous. One third of Indigenous women diagnosed with HIV had acquired the virus during unsafe injecting drug use.
    • In New Zealand new HIV cases have doubled in recent years, from fewer than 80 in 1999 to 157 in 2004.
    • Sex between men accounted for about half the new diagnoses in New Zealand. Similar to Australia, more than 90% of people with heterosexually-acquired HIV diagnosed in 2004 had been infected abroad.

    Source: AIDS epidemic update: December 2005, http://www.unaids.org/epi/2005/index.asp, accessed 22 March 2006.

    Note: The UNAIDS/WHO estimates are based on the most recent available data on the spread of HIV in countries around the world. They are provisional. UNAIDS and WHO, together with experts from national AIDS programmes and research institutions, regularly review and update the estimates as improved knowledge about the epidemic becomes available, while also drawing on advances made in the methods for deriving estimates. Because of these and future advances, the current estimates cannot be compared directly with estimates published in previous years, nor with those that may be published subsequently.

  • John Kleinsman & Michael McCabe 1 April 2006

    It has been estimated that the Catholic Church provides approximately 25% of the total care given to those infected with HIV-AIDS, making it a major partner in the fight against this disease. Catholic organisations have also been at the forefront of campaigns to ensure that the infected have access to essential drugs at an affordable price.

    Many agencies involved in the campaign for prevention of HIV-AIDS actively advocate safe sex or safer sex through condom use as a primary means of reducing the risk of HIV transmission. Research data shows that this strategy has been effective in lowering the spread of HIV-AIDS when it has been part of a broader effort to influence behaviours.

    Catholic agencies, however, have consistently refused to distribute condoms. Instead, they have promoted chastity in the form of abstinence and/or marital fidelity as the best way of preventing further spread of the AIDS pandemic. The practical wisdom of this approach has generated widespread criticism from outside of the Church, and both support and criticism from those inside the Church.

    More recently a number of prominent Catholic voices, including bishops and theologians, have entered the debate in an attempt to either defend or to provide a more nuanced interpretation of the Church's stance. The question most often being asked is whether the Catholic Church should revisit its position on condoms.

    In response to this question, it first needs to be noted that the Vatican does not have an official position on the use of condoms in AIDS prevention. Cardinal Javier Lozano Barragan, head of the Pontifical Council for Health Pastoral Care is one of many who have explicitly noted that there has been no definitive papal statement on the subject. Neither is the matter commented on in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Some individuals have made remarks, but that is not the same as an official position," [1]

    It is interesting to note that outside of Catholic circles it is becoming increasingly acknowledged that permissive and irresponsible behaviours must be addressed if any real impact is to be made on the spread of HIV infection. An article published in the Lancet (27 Nov 2004) by a group of medical experts notes that when campaigns target young people who have not yet initiated sexual activity, the first priority should be to encourage abstinence or delay of sexual onset, hence emphasising risk avoidance as the best way to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections as well as unwanted pregnancy. While the article supports condom use, it also points out that for those already involved in sexual activity, returning to abstinence or being mutually faithful with an uninfected partner are the most effective ways of avoiding infection.

    At the same time, it is a feature of the current Catholic debate over the use of condoms that an increasing number of senior Catholic leaders have publicly stated their belief that restricted condom use may be justifiable in faith based HIV prevention work. These leaders include Cardinal Barragan, Cardinal Danneels of Brussels, Cardinal Georges Cottier (theologian to the papal household), Cardinal Christian Tumi of Cameroon, Archbishop Boniface Lele of Kenya, Bishop Kevin Dowling of South Africa, Bishop Filipe Arizmendi of Mexico, Bishop Juan Antonio Martinez Camino of Spain and most recently Bishop Gilles Cote of Papua New Guinea.

    The comments made by these leaders - and some moral theologians have generally focused on two moral questions: (i) whether or not married couples might legitimately use condoms when one partner is HIV positive and the other is not (statistics show that worldwide most HIV positive women have been infected by their monogamous, life-long partner) and (ii) whether condoms should be used by those engaging in extra-marital sex.

    Responding to the first question, Cardinal Barragan has offered his personal view that the use of condoms may be justified as an act of self-defence. If an infected husband wants to have sex with his wife who isn't infected, then she must defend herself by whatever means necessary. [2] Other theologians have expressed the opinion that condom use is justified as a form of health protection. Describing the issue as a conscience one reserved to the couple themselves, the South African Bishops' Conference have written: They are the only ones who can choose the appropriate means, in order to defend themselves against the infection. Decisions of such an intimate nature should be made by both husband and wife as equal and loving partners. [3] In a similar vein, Bishop Kevin Dowling, drawing on Humanae Vitae, the 1968 encyclical that condemns artificial contraception but supports the use of oral contraceptives for the medical purpose of controlling menstrual bleeding, sees it as providing a moral precedent for married couples to use a condom. Dowling has been quoted as saying that when used to protect against AIDS, condoms are not being used as a contraceptive.

    On the question of those engaging in extra-marital sex, there is unanimous agreement by Catholics that such activity is immoral. Nevertheless, while adamant that chastity is the best way to prevent AIDS and HIV infection, Danneels, and others, note that failure to use a condom by someone who is HIV positive merely adds the sin of the fifth commandment (thou shalt not kill) to the sin against the sixth commandment (thou shalt not commit adultery).

    Some theologians justify the use of condoms in such situations in terms of the principle of the lesser evil. This principle is designed to cover cases where a person is clearly committed to performing an evil act. In such cases, knowing that they cannot persuade them from performing the act, any one who is in a position to influence that person may counsel them to do something less serious. Some have gone so far as to say that the use of condoms in such a situation is a moral obligation.

    In the face of these responses by some senior church leaders, other leaders continue to reject the use of condoms in any situation, exhorting married couples that the only assured way to prevent passing on the HIV virus is for them to express their love in ways other than through sexual intercourse. For many, the concern is that the church, by changing its position, could be seen to be institutionalising promiscuity? Many argue that it also represents a departure from the Catholic Church's longstanding and principled opposition to contraception?

    Redemptorist Father Brian Johnstone, a moral theologian at Rome's Alphonsian Academy, has stated his belief that the comments by Danneel's and others can be seen as totally consistent with traditionally accepted principles in Catholic moral theology. Those who think Danneels 'contradicted' church teaching don't understand the difference between two levels of moral discourse: one is a moral rule, the other the application of that rule in a complex situation. Considering how to apply a norm in a particular situation is not to undermine the norm. [4]

    Catholic AIDS workers are another significant voice in the ongoing debate over condom use. Emphasising the fact that they are the ones working day in and day out with the victims of the HIV virus, many are advocating the need for a pastoral approach that better reflects the reality of people's lives. Without wanting - or needing - to challenge the wisdom of the Catholic emphasis on abstinence and fidelity, people like Ann Smith (CAFOD) argue that 'risk' needs to be understood in terms of a continuum, with high risk activity at one end and low or no risk at the other end. She points out that reducing risk is a process; a process that occurs within a complex cultural and social context that acts upon and often limits an individual's ability to choose a particular path. [5] The contextual factors referred to include such things as the economic deprivation of many families (and women in particular), cultural attitudes to women, pressures to conform to certain stereotypes, social and cultural attitudes towards sexuality and illness and exploitative employers, to name some of the more obvious ones. It is over simplistic, idealistic and pastorally naive, Smith argues, to frame the challenge to change one's sexual behaviours as a simple exercise of individual moral agency when people's choices are constrained by so many structural and institutional factors.

    Looked at from this perspective, it is argued that reducing a person's level of risk taking through the use of condoms, in addition to implementing programmes that seek social transformation that will enable other personal changes to take place, can be regarded as a necessary step on their journey to grow more fully in their God-given identity.

    The theological justification for this approach is part of the accepted Catholic moral tradition. In Familiaris Consortio (n.9) Pope John Paul II exhorts Catholics to set themselves in opposition to all injustices penetrating the structures of today's world through a conversion of mind and heart. However, fully acknowledging the injustice originating from sin - which has profoundly penetrated the structures of today's world - often hindering the family's full realization of itself and of its fundamental rights, he then says:

    What is needed is a continuous, permanent conversion which, while requiring an interior detachment from every evil and an adherence to good in its fullness, is brought about concretely in steps which lead us ever forward. Thus a dynamic process develops, one which advances gradually with the progressive integration of the gifts of God and the demands of God's definitive and absolute love in the entire personal and social life of humankind. Therefore an educational growth process is necessary, in order that individual believers, families and peoples, even civilization itself may patiently be led forward, arriving at a richer understanding and a fuller integration of this mystery in their lives.

    To adopt such an approach to moral action does not necessarily imply that the ideal has been abandoned or even undermined. Rather, it reflects the reality that an ideal is always reached in steps, and that the ideal must be nurtured.In the meantime the debate continues.

    John Kleinsman is a Researcher for The Nathaniel Centre. 
    Michael McCabe, PhD is Director of The Nathaniel Centre.


    [1] Franciscan Father Maurizio Faggioni, moral theologian and a consultor to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, quoted by John Thavis in VATICAN LETTER, AIDS and Condoms: Issue far from settled at the Vatican, Dec-12-2003, Catholic News Service.

    [2] Quoted by Stacy Meichtry, AIDS, condoms and grass-roots reality: Cardinal's words may indicate moral trickle-up from health workers, in National Catholic Reporter, Feb 25, 2005.

    [3] South African Bishops' Conference, Message of Hope, 30 July 2001.

    [4] Quoted by John L. Allen Jr. The Word from Rome: Cardinal Danneels on Condoms, in National Catholic Reporter, January 16, 2004.

    [5] Smith, Ann. (2004). HIV Debate: No simple Solutions, in The Tablet, 25 September 2004.

    ©
    2006

  • Michael McCabe 1 April 2006

    Jesus recognition and inclusion, to the point of table-fellowship, of the poor and excluded provides the model for Christian ministry to people with AIDS-HIV the compassionate reception of deprived human others is at the heart of Jesus' ministry                               Enda McDonagh

    One of the blessings of my ministry as Director of The Nathaniel Centre has been the invitation to work in partnership with Caritas Aotearoa New Zealand and Caritas Australia to help to address the challenge of HIV-AIDS in Oceania. While I had some awareness of the enormity of the problem of AIDS [Acquired Immunodaficiency Syndrome] among particelar communities, and in places such as Sub-Saharan Africa, I was quite ignorant of the extent of HIV-AIDS in Oceania. Consequently, in 2000, when Bishop Peter Cullinane passed on to me a request from the Bishops' Conference of Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands for assistance in dealing with the theological and pastoral issues associated with HIV-AIDS, I embarked on a learning experience which was to have a profound effect on me personally.

    The then Director of Caritas in New Zealand, Anne Dickinson, who had been to Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands a numbep of times as part of her work, encouraged me to respond to this request and offered Caritas support for the project. With Anne's help a seminar was developed, making use of the material provided by English Caritas agency, CAFOD, a leader in HIV-AIDS work in the developing world, together with research carried out by the staff of The Nathaniel Centre on the theological issues and on the pastoral issues in Oceania.

    The seminar entitled, A Theological and Pastoral Response to HIV-AIDS in Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands, was held at Goroka in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea February 2001 and attended by twenty-two bishops and four religious sisters involved in HIV-AIDS work. Two fur`her seminars have since been presented in Kiribati [2003] and Tonga [2005].

    The profound gift that these seminars have been lead me to believe that I was not alone in my limited awareness of AIDS in Oceania even though this disease is much closer to home and even though it represents a singular challenge for the Church in Oceania. Because HIV-AIDS is the biggest challenge that the Church in Oceania currently faces we have made this issue of The Nathaniel Report a themed issue on HIV-AIDS.

    Geneva-based Special Advisor on HIV and AIDS to Caritas Internationalis Father Robert Vitillo has gifted us with the keynote article to this edition an edited version of his Pacem in Terris Lecture given at Georgetown University, Washington, USA, in October 2005. In his lecture Father Vitillo beautifully illustrates two of the central themes in this year's Lenten Message of Pope Benedict XVI, namely, that integral human development is necessarily holistic and necessarily compassionate. Pope Benedict says, Enlightened by this Paschal truth, the Church knows that if we are to promote development in its fullness, our own 'gaze' upon mankind has to be measured against that of Christ. In fact, it is quite impossible to separate the response to people's material and social needs from the fulfilment of the profound desires of their hearts.

    Our response to those with HIV-AIDS will depend upon our vision of Christian morality. Morality that is based on abstract notions of the good is inadequate for the task. The Christian vision of morality is located within relationship relationship with God, relationship with the self and relationship with others. We are particular persons in a particular time with particular relationships. Our history, our story, our culture, shapes how we see God, how we see others, and how we see ourselves. All these factors shape our moral vision and our response to AIDS.

    The heart of our response to HIV-AIDS, and indeed to all human development, is compassion the compassion of Christ for all no matter what their condition. In his Apostolic Letter on Human Suffering [1984:n.28] Salvifici Doloris, Pope John Paul II wrote: The parable of the Good Samaritan belongs to the Gospel of suffering. For it indicates what the relationship of each of us must be towards our suffering neighbour. We are not allowed to 'pass by on the other side' indifferently; we must 'stop' beside him. Everyone who stops beside the suffering of another person, whatever form it may take, is a Good Samaritan. This stopping does not mean curiosity but availability. It is like the opening of a certain interior disposition of the heart, which also has an emotional expression of its own

    When a member of the Body of Christ has HIV-AIDS then, in a very real sense, the entire Body of Christ has HIV-AIDS. To understand this is equally to understand the new pastoral and theological challenges that HIV-AIDS is bringing to the Body of Christ in Oceania and internationally. While these challenges call for fresh theological and pastoral approaches they also call us to return to our traditional fonts of moral and pastoral wisdom and view them from a fresh perspective. That is precisely the challenge that Jesus provides for the lawyer in the parable of the Good Samaritan. He encourages him to revisit the law and religious traditions of his people in a spirit of compassion so that he can once more become a neighbour to the man in need.

    In this Paschal Season when we once again reflect on the depth of God the Father's compassion in Christ we are left are left in no doubt that compassion must shape our response to HIV-AIDS.
    _____________________

    Rev Michael McCabe, PhD
    Director
    The Nathaniel Centre

    ©
    2006

     


  • Robert J Vitillo 1 April 2006

    The following is an edited version of an address delivered by Rev Robert J Vitillo at Georgetown University, Washington, U.S.A. It was delivered as part of the Pacem in Terris Lecture Series - 24 October 2005.

    Introduction
    Let us take a few brief moments to recall the global context into which Pope John XXIII unveiled his Encyclical carrying the English title of Peace on Earth on 11 April 1963. The first half of the twentieth century already had seen two world wars and conflict in Korea that caused millions of deaths, including efforts at genocide, as well as untold destruction of property, cultural heritage, and social infrastructure. During the cliff-hanging Cuban Missile Crisis, which occurred some six months before the release of Pacem in Terris, Pope John XXIII took the extraordinary measure of a public appeal on Vatican radio in an attempt to de-fuse the stand-off between U.S. President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita S. Krushchev. To the shock of many in the Curia Romana, Pope John departed from the carefully nuanced text prepared by the diplomats in the Vatican's Secretariat of State and made his own emotional and heart-felt appeal, We beg all rulers not to be deaf to the cry of humanity.

    The Pillars of Peace
    I am quite certain that Blessed John XXIII, were he to address the present-day threat of HIV and AIDS, would re-awaken that same appeal and issue it not only to the rulers of the world but to all the members of the human family. The global response to this pandemic requires much more than sentinel sero-prevalence studies, the expansion of health services, massive education programs focused on behavior change, and social support services for the survivors of those who already succumbed to AIDS-related illnesses. All those measures already are being taken and have met with only limited success. Thus I am convinced that the missing link in the global AIDS response is the authentic human development made possible through the four pillars of peace proposed by John XXIII: truth, justice, freedom, and love.

    Lest I be accused of exaggerating the links between HIV and AIDS and world peace and security, let us see what the international experts have to say about this matter. In fact, elevated sero-prevalence rates among military and law enforcement personnel cause grave concern in many countries:

    • In Russia, between 1995 and 2003, the number of soldiers found to be HIV-infected increased from .1 per 100,000 to 40 per 100,000;
    • In Mozambique, new recruits cannot be trained fast enough to replace police dying of AIDS-related illnesses;
    • In Ethiopia, a sero-survey among police officers' wives found one-third of them to be HIV-positive.

    However, the linkage between HIV and security extends far beyond the number of those in the military or police forces living with the virus; it reaches the very core and infrastructure of human society. In the year 2000, the United Nations Security Council declared, in its Resolution 1308, that the spread of HIV and AIDS can have a uniquely devastating impact on all sectors and levels of society and if unchecked, may pose a risk to stability and security. In December 2004, the High-Level Panel on Threat, Challenges and Change, convened by United Nations Secretary General Kofi-Annan warned that generalized AIDS epidemics can:

    • erode the ability of countries to govern themselves and to provide essential services as a result of the loss of needed populations, not only in uniformed services, but also in key public and private sectors;
    • change the pattern of savings, investments and consumption, since families have to alter their household priorities in order to care for sick members;
    • alter the very nature of family and multi-generational relations, since grandparents are called upon to care for orphans and again become the primary income generators.

    It is regrettable that, to date, the implementation of Security Council Resolution 1308 has focused more on educating UN Peacekeeping troops and other military personnel about the dangers of indiscriminate sexual activity than on promoting authentic human development. Such an alternative emphasis could make possible a much more profound and stable peace as was envisioned by the man known as good Pope John:

    Peace on Earth which [people] throughout the ages [have] so longed for and sought after can never be established, never guaranteed, except by the diligent observance of the divinely established order and yet there is a disunity among individuals and among nations which is in striking contrast to this perfect order in the universe.

    The Search for Truth in Understanding the Global Situation of HIV and AIDS
    Before a Society can be considered well-ordered and consonant with human dignity, it must be based on truth And so will it be, if each [person] acknowledges his [or her] own rights and his [or her] own duties toward others. (Pacem in Terris, #35)

    In the course of my rather unique global ministry, I often have encountered massive denial and misunderstanding about the roots and impact of this pandemic. In almost every country I have visited, some well-meaning medical professional or cleric has pulled me aside to inform me that HIV really arrived there from the neighboring province, or territory, or is limited to the foreigners or diverse ethnic groups, since, of course, our people do not do the kinds of things that spread AIDS! It is just such a lack of, or distortion of, truth whether intentional or truly mistaken that prevents the global family, and faith communities as well, from mobilizing the necessary knowledge, commitment, and resources to address the HIV pandemic.

    Another pervasive misconception about HIV and AIDS is that it is no more alarming than other global health problems. In a speech given at the London School of Economics, Dr. Peter Piot, Executive Director of UNAIDS, warned:

    This pandemic is exceptional because there is no plateau in sight, exceptional because of the severity and longevity of its impact, and exceptional because of the special challenges it poses to effective public action.

    Dr. Piot substantiated his claim with the following points:

    • The pandemic has broken with the general pattern of diseases and natural disasters, which usually create their own brutal equilibrium, eventually enabling societies to cope. AIDS, so far, appears to be doing the opposite.
    • Thus, in Botswana, Swaziland, and other parts of southern Africa the HIV prevalence rate among adults is around 40 per cent and still rising.
    • in country after country, the tipping point is being reached after which AIDS no longer remains concentrated in so-called 'hot spots' but becomes a generalized explosion across the entire population.
    • By 2006, el%ven sub-Saharan countries will have lost more than every 10th person in their labour force to AIDS and, by 2010, five countries in this region will have lost more than every fifth person in their labour force.
    • AIDS will slow the rate of poverty reduction in Cambodia by 20 per cent every year between 2003 and 2015.
    • Prejudice and discomfort about how HIV is transmitted are, unfortunately, still so widespread that they continue to silence many leaders, not just political leaders but also civil society leaders.

    Only in the pursuit and communication of complete and undistorted truth, can we ever hope to mount an effective campaign against the spread of HIV and AIDS. In this regard, we might see the words of Pope John XXIII as prophetic when applied to the situation of today's pandemic:

    It is essential, therefore, that the instruction given to our young people be complete and continuous, and imparted in such a way that moral goodness and the cultivation of religious values may keep pace with scientific knowledge and continually advancing technical progress.

    The Imperative of Justice in confronting the destructive impact of HIV and AIDS
    Human society, as we here picture it, demands that [women and] men be guided by justice, respect the rights of others, and do their duty. (Pacem in Terris, #35)

    The poorest, most marginalized and oppressed members of society are also the most vulnerable to the threat of HIV and the tragic consequences of AIDS. They are deprived of access to the preventive education, care, treatment, and support which they urgently need.

    Such inequitable access is intimately linked to the personal and family well-being, or lack thereof, among those affected by the pandemic. Availability of combination, anti-retroviral therapy is a particular case in point. One can easily identify a cause-effect relationship between the 3,000,000 deaths due to AIDS last year and the lack of availability of anti-retroviral medications among those living with AIDS in low- and middle-income countries. For this reason, the World Heath Organization developed its 3x5 Initiative to work toward the provision of anti-retroviral medications to three million people in developing countries by 2005. The success of this initiative might be considered partial since, as of June 2005, only one million people had received treatment, but, to the contrary, I would agree with the following assessment made by executives of the World Health Organization and UNAIDS:

    From crowded metropolis to isolated village, structures are being put into place that allow hundreds of thousands of people to access a level of medical care that, just a short time ago, was unimaginable.

    Global funding for HIV and AIDS programs has increased significantly, from $300 million in 1996, to $6.1 billion in 2004, much of that due to the formation of and support for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, as well as bi-lateral efforts such as the U.S. President's Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). By the year 2007, however, approximately US$20 billion will be needed in order to meet a range of needs. Just in case some of you question how the global community can generate the funds to provide such medications and services to so many people, let us not forget that an estimated $52 billion per year is spent in the United States in order to cope with the medical consequences of obesity.

    A question may be posed about whether all this funding really does make a difference in the lives of poor people. In response, I would like to share a personal testimony. During a June 2005 visit to Uganda, I simply could not identify what was different about the surrounding sights on the road between Entebbe Airport and Kampala a road that became familiar to me during previous visits to the country. The same red clay was causing dust to be spread everywhere; the same crowds of people could be seen walking along the roadway, carrying on their heads the heavy bundles for essential daily living; the same broad waves and smiles of children were ubiquitous. It was only after riding for many miles that I realized the difference: no longer could coffins be seen as the most prominent items for sale in the local markets! In the early 1990s, the omni-presence of coffins along the roadways definitely signaled the major but sad economic growth industry in this country. My intuition about decreasing death rates was confirmed during my visit to the Kamwokya Catholic community, located in a slum at the outskirts of Kampala. There I rejoiced with the poor but proud residents who told me of their death-resurrection experience. Because they now had access to ARVs, those who once were at death's door could now return to work and farming, provide for their families, and were themselves serving as staff and volunteers in AIDS care, support, and treatment programs and in HIV prevention education.

    The Catholic Church has assumed a forceful role in advocating for a just solution to the inequities in treatment access. In his statement to the UN Special Session on HIV and AIDS, held in 2001, Javier Cardinal Lozano Barrag President of the Vatican's Pontifical Council on Health Care, clearly stated:

    An important factor contributing to the rapid spread of AIDS is the situation of extreme poverty experienced by a great part of humanity. Certainly a decisive factor in combating the disease is the promotion of social justice, in order to bring about a situation in which economic consideration would no longer serve as the sole criterion in an uncontrolled globalization.

    In May 2005, I was privileged to serve on the Holy See Delegation to the World Health Assembly, during which meeting, Cardinal Barragpointed out that, on a worldwide basis, the total annual budget for medicines is estimated between U.S. $50 and $60 billion per year, and then urgently asked why only 0.2% of this budget is dedicated to respiratory illnesses, tuberculosis, and diarrheal diseases, all of which have a disproportionate impact on poor and low-income people. The Cardinal could have found his question unnecessary had the world taken better heed of the admonition of Pope John XXIII:

    on the international level: some nations may have attained to a superior degree of scientific, cultural, and economic development. But that does not entitle them to exert political domination over other nations. It means that they have to make a greater contribution to the common cause of social progress.

    During his address to same 2005 World Health Assembly, Microsoft President Bill Gates conveyed the impression that he was reading from a page of Catholic Social Teaching:

    In my view and there is no diplomatic way to put this: The world is failing billions of people. Rich governments are not fighting some of the world's most deadly diseases, because rich countries don't have them

    Let's be frank about this. If these epidemics were raging in the developed world, people with resources would see the suffering and insist that we stop it

    That is why I express the sincere hope that the alumni of Georgetown University will leave these hallowed halls not only fortified with the political, administrative, commercial, and technical skills to advance the struggle against HIV and AIDS but also animated by the cardinal virtue of justice that demands equitable sharing of the resources in such efforts. For, as Pope John Paul II, reminded us:

    What is at stake is the very meaning of scientific and technological research, of social life and of culture, but, on an even more profound level, what is at stake is the very meaning of the human person.

    Respect for Human Dignity and Freedom Essential Resources to Eliminate the Spread of HIV and AIDS
    ... Human society thrives on freedom, namely on the use of means which are consistent with the dignity of its individual members, who, being endowed with reason, assume responsibility for their own actions. Pacem in Terris, #35

    One root cause for the spread of HIV can be found in the imbalance of power in gender relations. In addition to being up to six times more vulnerable than their male partners to contract HIV through sexual activity, women all too frequently face particular oppression at the hands of men and thus are prevented from realizing their God-given human dignity and freedom. Thus, in many countries, women become infected at significantly higher rates than men and at a much earlier period in their lives.

    Let us examine more closely some tragic trends in this regard:

    Women are confronted almost daily with their relative lack of control over personal health and sexual activity as well as over the sexual activity of their partners. They cannot negotiate, still less refuse, sexual relations within marriage. At the present time, marriage constitutes the greatest risk factor for a woman in Africa to contract HIV.

    Poverty all too often forces women and children to enter into prostitution to support themselves and their families, and in some circumstances, families even sell their children into prostitution in order to pay off debts or to advance the family's financial security.

    Sexual violence in many societies can be a contributing factor to the spread of HIV. Worldwide, one in five women is a victim of rape or attempted rape at least once during her lifetime, and more women between the ages of 15 and 44 years are killed or made infirm by violence than by cancer. In Kenya, a nation-wide study of 12- to 24-year old women found that one in four is forced into intercourse as a first sexual experience. In South Africa, an estimated 370,000 women are raped every year. A Canadian study revealed that 17.8% of women respondents reported sexual abuse (rape or attempted rape) before the age of 16 years.

    In his message to the 1995 United Nations Fourth World Conference on the Concerns of Women, held in Beijing, Pope John Paul II committed the 300,000 social, educational and caring institutions of the Catholic Church to give priority to women and young girls, especially the poorest. During his greeting to the General Assembly of the World Union of Catholic Women's Organisations, held in 2001, he reaffirmed that commitment:

    Working together, you must seek to provide increasing material and moral support to women in difficulty, victims of poverty and violence.

    These sage papal exhortations may need some bolstering actions, however, in order to reduce the vulnerability of women to HIV infection. During a recent workshop that I facilitated in Togo, I heard the disturbing testimony of a woman, whose husband had infected her with HIV and who, after being widowed at 23 years of age, was deprived by her in-laws of her home and all her possessions and then was left to fend for herself and her newly-born child. I reflected, during that seminar, with priests, women religious and lay pastoral workers on what additional measures might be needed to avoid such all-too-frequent occurrences. They insisted that projects of economic self-sufficiency for women were the most effective means to assure that women remain free of HIV.

    The Mandate of Unselfish Love in a Time of HIV and AIDS
    [Human Society] demands, too, that [people] be animated by such love as will make them feel the needs of others as their own, and induce them to share their goods with others, and to strive in the world to make all alike heirs to the noblest of intellectual and spiritual values. Pacem in Terris, #35

    The lessons of history taught by experience with previous pandemics should have clearly demonstrated that good public health policies require acceptance and non-judgmental care and support for those affected. Yet, I feel compelled to report that attempts to "cast out" those affected by HIV disease - from villages, hospitals, educational institutions, and faith communities - have been experienced in virtually all parts of the world and among all racial and ethnic groups, as well as in all social and economic classes. Sadly, some priests and ministers have refused pastoral care and church burial to the HIV-infected. Many governments at one time or another have enacted policies of forced isolation and restriction of travel by HIV-infected persons, while others have tolerated, and even encouraged, violence toward such individuals.

    These discriminatory policies tend to create fear and secretive activity, even among those who already have basic knowledge about the pandemic. In southern Africa, a study on needle stick injuries in primary health care clinics found that nurses did not report the injuries because they did not want to be tested for HIV. Research carried out in four Nigerian states, reported that 10% of care providers refused to serve HIV-positive patients and 20% indicated their belief that many people living with HIV had behaved immorally and deserved to be infected. Such attitudes and actions do not occur only in developing countries. Just recently, a man living with HIV in the United States told me of his experience with a nurse in a local hospital. His intravenous line became disconnected and there was a significant amount of bleeding at the IV site, but the nurse panicked because she knew of his HIV status. She ran out of the room, refused to care for him and even neglected to instruct him about applying pressure to his own wound in order to decrease the loss of blood.

    Pope John Paul II made frequent and emotional appeals to avoid discriminatory treatment of people living with HIV and AIDS. In his visit to AIDS patients in the United States (1989), he held out the unconditional love of God himself as the guideline to be followed:

    God loves you all, without distinction, without limit He loves those of you who are sick, those suffering from AIDS. He loves the friends and relatives of the sick and those who care for them. He loves all with an unconditional and everlasting love.

    The bishops of the Southern Africa Catholic Bishops' Conference leave no room for any possibility of stigmatisation or marginalization based on the false premise that God has willed AIDS for sinful individuals:

    AIDS must never be considered as a punishment from God. He wants us to be healthy and not to die from AIDS. It is for us a sign of the times challenging all people to inner transformation and to the following of Christ in his ministry of healing, mercy and love.

    In many ways, Pope John XXIII prophetically envisioned the benchmark for effective care and support to those living with and affected by HIV and AIDS when he wrote in Pacem in Terris:

    love, not fear, must dominate relationships between individuals and nations. It is principally characteristic of love that it draws [women and] men together in all sorts of ways, sincerely united in the bonds of mind and matter; and this is a union from which countless blessings flow.

    During a recent visit to Vietnam, I witnessed firsthand the blessings that can flow from such a loving response to the daily sting and harmful impact of HIV and AIDS. Despite the delicate Church-state relationship in this country, the government there has requested the Catholic Church to assist with care and support of intravenous drug-users in the terminal stages of AIDS-related illnesses. It is important to note that, until very recently, HIV and AIDS was presented by the Vietnamese government as one of the five major social evils in the country a designation that does not easily engender a compassionate response to those living with this virus. The Catholic Archdiocese of Ho Chi Minh City responded to the government call for help by mobilizing volunteers from religious orders to serve in a so-called drug rehabilitation center located in an isolated and rural area. Upon arrival at this center, I was struck by the joy and peace that seemed to be omni-present among the forty religious men and women from seventeen different religious orders in service there. Much more importantly, however, I heard the testimony of their patients who reported that the sisters, brothers, and priests had literally loved them back to life. Now the Church workers are being challenged by some government officials about their high failure rate since the Church was supposed to help these patients to die but, to the contrary, too many patients are surviving one after another opportunistic infection!

    Not all the stories can be reported so positively. Listen to this experience recounted by Fr. Joe Arimoso, SJ, a newly-ordained Jesuit, on mission in Zimbabwe, who was called upon to minister to a woman who was desperately ill:

    I looked at Ruth and in that single paralyzing moment I saw the face of poverty, the face of AIDS, I saw that shadowy face of despair hovering over hope. She half opened her eyes and looked at me. When she blinked, a shy teardrop escaped from her left eye. Ruth was crying. A wave of emotion overcame me and I broke down with her. I wondered what was making me shed tears then. Little did I know that I was already grieving for Ruth. She died twenty minutes after I anointed her.

    I feel blessed to observe this type of ministry, based both on the highest degree of professional expertise and on compassionate, non-judgmental care, that is provided by Catholic religious orders and organizations in many places throughout the world. I am very pleased to announce that, in January 2006, Caritas Internationalis, in collaboration with the Permanent Observer Mission of the Holy See to the United Nations and Specialized Agencies in Geneva, UNAIDS, and the World Health Organization, will convene various Catholic efforts with major engagement in this field, in order to strategically plan a scale up of the education, care, support, and treatment offered under such auspices. Catholic organizations could be proud of their HIV and AIDS work to date, but much more is needed in order to keep pace with the spread and impact of this frightening pandemic.

    Conclusion: If you want to fight AIDS, build peace!
    Let us, then pray with all fervor for this peace which our divine Redeemer came to bring us May He transform all [women and] men into witnesses of truth, justice, and love. Pacem in Terris, #171

    Perhaps by now, at the conclusion of my lecture, you have discerned the reason for my gratitude upon being invited to contribute reflections in conjunction with this Pacem in Terris lecture series. In his landmark encyclical, Pope John XXIII offered us the building-blocks to mold and shape peace that is lasting, comprehensive, and divinely-inspired the harmonious shalom - of which the prophets and psalmists spoke and sang frequently in the Old Testament of our Sacred Scriptures. The pillars of truth, justice, freedom, and love could serve as equally effective and crucial components for an HIV and AIDS initiative capable of eliminating the root causes of vulnerability to this pandemic and of addressing the crying needs of those already affected. Thus, in conclusion, I add my prayer to that of Pope John XXIII whose encyclical inspired this lecture series and could serve equally well as the inspiration for next World AIDS Campaign:

    may Christ inflame the desires of all to break through the barriers which divide them, to strengthen the bonds of mutual love, to learn to understand one another, and to pardon those who have done them wrong. Through His power and inspiration may all peoples welcome each other to their hearts , and may the peace they long for ever flower and ever reign among them.
    _____________________________________

    Rev Robert J Vitillo is the Geneva based Special Advisor on HIV and AIDS to Caritas Internationalis.

    A full list of references for this lecture is available from The Nathaniel Centre on request.

     ©
    2006

     

  • Michael McCabe 30 November 1999

    Introduction
    In recent years The Nathaniel Centre and Caritas-Aotearoa New Zealand have worked in partnership to address the problem of HIV-AIDS in Oceania and the Pacific Islands. To date three seminars have been held: The first was for the Bishops' Conference of Papua New Guinea-Solomon Islands; the second and third seminars were held for priests, religious and laity in Kiribati and in Tonga at the invitation of Bishop Paul Mea, Bishop of Tarawa-Nauru, and Bishop Soane Foliaki, Bishop of Tonga-Niue. The Church is still relatively young in these countries, less than 100 years old in some instances. This youthfulness is most evident in the remarkable vibrancy of these faith communities. Their desire to respond to the growing AIDS pandemic is an illustration of their vitality and is helping to reshape the way in which they live out the gospel.

    A number of salient issues emerged from these workshops which underscore the current challenge of responding to HIV-AIDS in Oceania.

    The scope of the problem
    It is easy to look at figures and not see the faces behind them so that the meaning of AIDS in human terms is misunderstood. A strength of each seminar was the personal knowledge and first-hand experience of AIDS brought by those who were familiar with the human face of the epidemic through their role as nurses, doctors and priests, or as members of families who had lost loved ones to AIDS. Even so, these people were amazed at the extent of the disease. Familiarity with the human faces of HIV-AIDS had not translated into a full appreciation of the impact on their communities. For example, in Papua New Guinea doctors estimate that they risk losing 25% of their population a million people in 9 years. It is also estimated that there will be a 25% decrease in the workforce by 2010. [See Table on page 15 for further statistics of HIV-AIDS in the Oceanian Region]

    Even the official statistics, sobering as they are, fail to highlight the gravity of the problem - they are indicative only. There is general agreement that reported cases of HIV-AIDS are merely the tip of the iceberg. For example, in 2002 NZAID reported some 40 cases of AIDS in Kiribati although the actual number of cases was thought to be about 250. Under-reporting of HIV is due to a number of factors including poor accessibility of populations at risk to HIV testing sites, limited testing facilities, and the perception among the general population that they are not at risk.

    It is clear that the biological, epidemiological and pathological aspects of HIV intersect with the cultural, social and religious values and disvalues of a particular community. This calls for a unique pastoral response to HIV-AIDS in each country the first step of which is listening to the specific culture and examining the relevant cultural mores that could either influence the spread of the disease or assist in retarding it.

    Listening to the culture
    Pope John Paul II once described culture as the first voice of the sacred. This means that in any theological and pastoral response to HIV-AIDS the Church must facilitate an open and honest dialogue between the local culture and the gospel. In the document Ecclesia in Oceania (nn. 3-4) we read that the path to deeper faith is not only shaped by leaving behind sin but equally by leaving behind sterile ways of thinking and acting. All cultures and religions have some aspects which have become sterile ways of thinking and acting. All are in continual need of conversion and growth.

    The process of authentic listening allows for a problem to be understood and for a clearer definition and focus to emerge so that any pastoral vision is grounded in reality. As the seminars progressed, a sense of possibility and hope took shape as people shared their stories. Initially the magnitude and scope of the epidemic appeared to be overwhelming, but real seeds of hope began to emerge bringing enlightenment and offering a way forward. As moral theologian Leonard Martin, CSsR, says: Moral theology can help prevent AIDS, but only if it learns to listen before it speaks, and only if it learns to discern when to offer milk and when to offer good, red meat.

    In this respect, two significant issues that surfaced from listening to the culture were the pre-scientific understandings of the disease concerning its nature and the manner in which it is spread, and the taboo nature of the subject of sexuality which, in turn, has negative repercussions for people admitting that they are HIV positive.

    Some participants felt that the Church exacerbated this difficulty while others felt the taboo nature of sexuality in the Church was merely a reflection of the generally taboo nature of sexuality in Oceanian society. Herein lies a great challenge for the Church, namely, to reflect upon the ways in which it has understood sexuality and equally the ways in which it dialogues with different cultural understandings of sexuality. For example some participants said that as polygamy was still legal, the Church had responsibility to understand the different meanings of fidelity and marriage in order to address the factors influencing the spread of HIV-AIDS.

    The community and the individual
    Somewhat in contrast to Western culture, in Oceanian culture the communal identity is more important than, and even prior to, the identity of the individual apart from the group the individual is nothing. An expression of this is found in the Papua New Guinea concept of wontok wontok literally means one-talk. In a wontok, language and cultural values are shared in a particular community as well as a number of obligations. Within such a system human rights are essentially communal, that is, rights can only be identified within the clan and by the clan. The wontok system strengthens communal bonds and enhances a sense of respect for the elders and reciprocity between families. Unfortunately the same system can impact adversely on the person living with AIDS.

    When a community is strong in the sense of its traditions, it is understandable that any discussion on issues of the causality of disease or other dangers to the community's integrity and well being can be very threatening. This helps to explain why responses to disease typically include denial, blame, punishment, discrimination and stigmatization. In many communities denial was often the first, and enduring, response to the presence of HIV-AIDS. Participants readily understood that denial and blame within society are natural reactions to what they described as the fear of disgrace particularly once an individual's HIV status becomes known. Several participants tied the denial of the AIDS epidemic into the secrecy of the wider culture. One religious sister said, by denial we spread this disease. She continued, and said, I actually wonder if irresponsible behaviour is in fact a form of deni!l!

    In many countries facing the AIDS pandemic the stigmatization of patients with HIV-AIDS results in their exclusion from the community. Being disconnected from the group through illness can add to the sense of shame and loss both for the person who is living with HIV-AIDS and for his or her family.

    This was poignantly illustrated in each of the seminars. For example, one participant said, the very first patient with AIDS was a Catholic. He came home to die and said before he died, 'It's strange even though my case is being discussed in Parliament - here I am dying more of loneliness than of AIDS' She continued, Only a handful of people came to his funeral and he was buried after just one night at home. Normally many people travel to a funeral and bring food and gifts and help to support the bereaved family. The young man's father still feels the stigma from his son's death because he was the first on the island to die from AIDS. A woman who was HIV positive said, My husband is already dead from AIDS and now I have got the disease from him. Please be kind to my children because they are being teased at scho/l

    A particular form of blame views AIDS as a punishment from God. If AIDS is viewed in this way then it logically follows that we can then free ourselves from any concern for our neighbour. Such a view is essentially a denial of the power of Christ to heal and also of the Gospel's power to liberate all people.

    These poignant stories, in turn, became the springboard not only for healing in the group but also for the realization that when one member of the Body of Christ has AIDS the whole Body of Christ has AIDS. In turn, this insight led the participants to reappraise their own culture in terms of its potential to bring healing and compassion to all no matter what their condition.

    Two further issues of significance that go to the heart of the causes of AIDS and which are very much intertwined are gender and poverty.

    Gender and poverty
    As the AIDS epidemic has developed over time there has been a growing recognition that social inequalities, poverty and power relations have an important impact on HIV transmission. Relationships between the sexes not simply sexual relationships - affect not only the development of the epidemic but the manner in which individuals and groups respond to it. The inferior status of women in gender relationships fosters risk-taking behaviour of men and exacerbates the special vulnerability of women to the virus across all socio-economic and age groups.

    The vulnerability of women to HIV infection is determined by a number of factors. These include their economic dependence on men and their resulting lack of power. Women are vulnerable to sexual exploitation, domestic violence, alcohol abuse, coercion and rape. Where cultural ideas of masculinity emphasise male power to the exclusion of other values, this is frequently expressed in violence. Similarly, where there is emphasis on male sexual pleasure and where men are socialised to be robust, daring and virile, then the culture can, implicitly at least, give legitimacy to males having multiple sexual partners and to their indulgence in risky sexual behaviour.

    Simply being married is a major risk factor for women who have little control over their sexual lives at home. The difference in power between men and women curtails women's freedom and expands men's sexual freedom, thereby increasing the vulnerability of both to HIV infection.

    Poverty and economic dependence on men often mean that women cannot leave risky relationships, that young girls may be enticed to have sex with older men for money or gifts, or that women may sell sex in order to support their families. The reality for some women in many parts of the world is that they cannot protect themselves from HIV by any method, including those that the Church promotes and those promoted by secular agencies.

    Conclusion
    Cultures have values which are consistent with the gospel. These values enable communities to both initiate and strengthen pastoral responses to HIV-AIDS. These values include respect of the elders, strong support for family life, hospitality, generosity and a communal lifestyle.

    Among the people and in the places of Oceania there is an enormous task of defining the problem of HIV-AIDS in a way that is acceptable and which facilitates open discussion. There can be no articulation of the issues without careful listening a task which is made more complex when one comes from outside the culture and is essentially a guest. The challenge before us in Oceania, while significant, is not impossible, not least because the people who participated in the workshops are clearly a people grounded in the providential spirituality of the land and the ocean. They are also a people of the story who, like any catechumen, have learnt to place their story within the story of the gospel, the story of Christ's redeeming love. Ultimately it is the gospel message of Christ's love that allowed the many dimensions of this issue to be both articulated and understood in a way that was respectful and life-giving for all.
    ___________________

    Rev Michael McCabe, PhD
    Director
    The Nathaniel Centre

    ©
    2006